Takeaways from February's Borough Council Meeting

Community Climate Initiative
Superintendent Tom Strickler said the district wants to get a handle on issues and develop an action plan.

School District Superintendent Tom Strickler and Dr. Gregory McGough, director of curriculum, explained the Community Climate Initiative and presented a “climate survey.” Strickler said there have been problems with students after school and the district wants to get a handle on the issue and develop an action plan. The Pennsylvania Department of Education and IU13 are helping the district’s initiative.

Dr. Gregory McGough laid out the stages of the process.

McGough said that one of the first steps is to create a vision of what we all see the school as. He said the process began with preparation and planning at the school level, and we are now at Stage 2: Delivering assessments to all stakeholders. Stage 3 will be to understand the findings and develop an action plan. Next will be the implementation phase, working with short, defined goals. The final step will be to reevaluate and start the process over.

Programs and Funding

Mayor Leo Lutz mentioned Manos House and Benchmark Programs to help with problems with youth in the community. He said the programs can’t be possible or sustainable if the borough has to solicit funds to pay for them.

“This is a community problem, this is a problem we must address. We need to fund these programs so that they’re sustainable,” he said. “We can put lights in the downtown, but that’s not going to help these kids.”

He said the challenge is trying to find grant money and getting organizations to donate. “We will not arrest our way out of these problems,” he said.

Our Home of Hope

Our Home of Hope received a $10,000 donation from council.

Council considered a donation request from Our Home of Hope for $30,000 to defray costs of facility repairs /renovations and operations at the 223-225 Cherry Street facility but in the end approved a donation of $10,000.

208-210 Locust Street

Council donated the former Bigler property at 208-210 Locust to the Lancaster County Land Bank.
Council voted to donate the 208-210 Locust Street to the Lancaster County Land Bank Authority.  At its November 2017 meeting, council approved $70,000 for the Lancaster County Land Bank to assist Brookline, a historic preservation company, with restoration of the property. Brookline’s budget for the project is $232,000. According to the agreement, the company will purchase the building for the token fee of $1 with the intent of restoring the facade and performing structural repairs. Brookline will then move its sister company, Lancaster Lime Works LLC, into the building.

MORE INFO HERE.

Funding for Study to Relocate Borough Offices

Council authorized an application to the Municipal Assistance Program. The program covers half the cost of a study the borough is undertaking to consider possible relocation of the borough offices and police station from its current location to other sites in the borough, one of which is the school district’s administration center building at 200 North Fifth Street.

One-Way Streets
The borough approved the following one-way streets to accommodate traffic calming methods and new parking areas and to address a safety issue:

*Rotary Ave (Front to Commerce Street: East)
* Commerce Street (Rotary Ave to Walnut Street: South)
* Tenth Street (Ironville Pike to Spruce Street: South)
* Bethel Street (Ridge to Locust traveling North) changed to (Locust to Cherry traveling South).

Quick Ticket Complaints

Residents voiced concerns about quick ticket citations.

Borough Manager Greg Sahd said there were 70 snow code quick tickets issued on one day in January. He said that a resident who posts a $100 fee for a hearing will have the amount returned “probably net of the fine” at the hearing.

Resident Gerald Maurer said the borough should exercise discretion on citations.

A resident argued that the borough should exercise discretion when citing residents for a small amount of snow on the sidewalk. Officials said that any amount of snow can be considered unsafe.

Councilwoman FitzGerald said that she received a quick ticket for snow as well and paid it.

Another resident said he received a quick ticket regarding his trash bag being out for pickup without being placed in a trash receptacle.

A landlord asked for a meeting with the borough manager and the code manager. He expressed concern about something said to him although he did not give details publicly. He said he was frustrated with the lack of response from borough officials.

0 thoughts on “Takeaways from February's Borough Council Meeting”

  1. thanks for the great pics! now a few things. residents go to council mtgs and complain about the quick tickets and i'd put money on it that they get NO response from council. Correct? That's funny. COUNCIL are the ones who MANDATE and direct the Codes Dept. They have the say. another thing….NO NO NO to relocating the Boro offices. ESPECIALLY TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT MUST BE SHUT DOWN. The hardWORKING taxpaying homeowners can NOT afford to continue to carry ALL this baggage. and then, to top it off, this Council SPENDS MONEY LIKE IT HAS IT'S OWN MONEY TREE. Residents WAKE UP. Things will only get worse. Have you seen the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS THIS COUNCIL HAS SPENT JUST IN THE PAST 2 MONTHS??????Unbelievable. Unacceptable. spend that money on a couple of K-9 officers. or something for the kids of this town to do. and a huge shout out to Don And Becky Murphy for stepping up, believing in your town and continuing to improve the downtown every day. THANK YOU!!!!!!! What a wonderful example. We appreciate all these things that you are doing. Thanks 🙂

    Like

  2. 40,000 fence 20,000 pad at river park 7,000 seal steps at river park 50,000 shore up of 208-210 75,000 more for 208-210 just the beginning, lots of money people

    Like

  3. 75,000 4th and locust- 65,000 dellinger -45,000 river park 3 -hotel locust how much is in that, but wood make new muny building.10,000 cherry st ,they get all residents s/s checks.none profit??? maybe a state audit is in order.

    Like

  4. Columbia#1 building would make a place for club goodtimes close to new 37 apartment building for entertainment for younger crowd.

    Like

  5. Mr Smoker and Mr Kreiser had the respect of students. But then they got there jobs honestly, not the back door like these losers did.

    Like

  6. Columbia borough, council, Columbia school district,Stricklers follies,mayor, etc are quickly becoming the laughing stock of the county,and soon the state.

    Like

  7. On 208 210 property check the back article on may 22 spy, code manager stated NO WAY SHOULD THE BOROUGH GET INVOLVED its a money pit (126,000)- 1 dollar they sold it for.Who over ruled this at our council????????

    Like

  8. Columbia #1 wouldn't make a good fit for the police station due to the railroad tracks and would cause delayed response times. Would make a good fit for the boro offices or some boro departments. But that would be too easy for council to figure out.

    Like

  9. Some say this site pits people against each other. You post what actions council took at the meeting, the critics need to look at council to see exactly who is pitting people against each other. The Spy isn't deciding how to spend taxpayers money. There's rarely more than a handful of residents at any meeting. If what happened wasn't posted here, the residents would have to wait on the minutes to know what decisions were made and the outcome of agenda items. They might get a few paragraphs in LNP, but again that does not always happen promptly either and information is limited. It's like a council woman said years ago when someone asked “How will the residents know?” Her reply was “Maybe they don't want to know.” And maybe she was right.Sharon Lintner

    Like

  10. I have NEVER heard of any home owner paving a borough street. That is misinformation. Our taxes pay for street paving. I want a refund if homeowners are now paying for street blacktop. If this is the case then the homeowners on Walnut Street need to get busy.

    Like

  11. The Columbia spy is the best,Cole does a great job letting people know whats going on . THIS BUNCH OF LOSSERS ON CONCIL SPENDS MONEY LIKE THERE IS NO TOMMORROW. $40,000 fence they need there heads checked.

    Like

  12. We no not need a costly survey to find out if borough offices/police should be moved. Why do we have a council if they cannot make logical decisions. Even I know what should be done here. Throwing money away on fences and Street lights again,what logic is needed here? They are not needed as we have other issues needing attention first. Now we are making a tiny piece of Tenth Street a one way when Spruce already is. This will cause accidents as it will be too confusing. Not getting the reason on this one. The schools, let the state take over. Arrest the kids throwing stones & sue the parents for damages. Perhaps they will parent better. When I was in school Kreiser & Wissler put the fear of God in you. And we are top heavy in administration. It's needs thinned out. We don't need these new people with large salaries. And why does such a small town need 4 codes' officers. Seriously this isn't Lancaster city. We need to wake up & vote these people out. Be insistent on what we want.

    Like

Leave a comment